Is that what you strive for in cinema? Stuff that's easy to comprehend, and stuff that "completely goes off the deep end"? To me, the more a director leaves up for interpretation, the better a film is.
When I say I wanted the film to go off the deep end, that's including discarding any definite meaning and doing a lot of interperative shit. 2001, for example, is a film that I would say, "goes off the deep end," and its ending is known as one of the most mysterious in all of cinema. I'm not looking for anything easily comprehendable and clear cut, if that's not what the director is going for.
I just felt as though Blake's "spiritual journey" could have been better visualized to the viewers.
