notice how they revert to lame jokes when they have nothing left to argue bc there whole argument was just as bad as the song he named himself after
Good point. He's been hassling me for one post I made pages and pages ago - that's what his argument is based around. It's the mark of a bad poster to bring up some completely unrelated topic instead of the argument at hand. I asked him why he kept hanging on to the Vincent LoScalzo and whether that helped his argument in any way and he said: "Because its apples and oranges and to bring guys like Loscalzo and Delia into the same comparison as modern day Buffalo is ridiculous in my opinion." So... why do you keep making lame LoScalzo jokes? Still not answering the question AT ALL. I ask why he brings up LoScalzo and is always reverting back to same LoScalzo jokes and this is his answer. He's great at dodging questions, he'd make a great politician.
