So evidently no one here can actually do common core math.

I sure there are brilliant mathemations on here who might be able to look it up on the internet and do one already done.

But no one can do that math if they were given a simple math question for the first time by their own kid

[quote=Aces][quote=helenwheels]



http://amp.washingtontimes.com/news...-debt-14-mont/?__twitter_impression=true[/quote

And the John Bolton rumors are concerning. "I promise to recycle all the failed Bushy warmongering neocon lunatics" isnt good policy.

Democrats criticize Trump's appointees and these are the same people that voted for crooked Hillary that has a hard time standing on her own two feet.

What does that have to do with political appointees? And what if you didn't vote for Hillary, then are you allowed to critique Trump's choices?

Like I always say, not trying to be rude, but I can't help but notice just about every single time someone criticizes Trump they are met with "But Democrat so-and-so did XYZ so they are worse!". Which has nothing to do with solutions, especially if you're like myself and not a Democrat.

I criticize Trump's appointees, but I'm not a Democrat and did not vote for Hillary. I've stated why I don't think DeVos was worthy of appointment. What's your retort?Again, not trying to be an asshole, but I'm genuinely interested to know how you feel without resorting to whatboutism.

I mentioned DeVos specifically because that's an appointee that I criticized, so I figured I would explain why to show you in good faith that I'm not just doing so blindly. And why would you have to mention me by name for me to question your thought process?

You don't seem interested in answering my questions though, so I'll leave it there.

I can't help but notice just about every single time someone criticizes Trump they are met with "But Democrat so-and-so did XYZ so they are worse!". .

Whataboutism (also known as whataboutery) is a variant of the tu quoque logical fallacy that attempts to discredit an opponent's position by charging them with hypocrisy without directly refuting or disproving their argument,[1][2][3] which is particularly associated with Soviet and Russian propaganda.[4][5][6] When criticisms were leveled at the Soviet Union, the Soviet response would be "What about..." followed by an event in the Western world.[7][8][9]...

...Critics say that US President Donald Trump has engaged in whataboutism in response to criticism leveled at him, his policies, or his support of controversial world leaders.[4][88][89] National Public Radio (NPR) reported, "President Trump has developed a consistent tactic when he's criticized: say that someone else is worse."[4] NPR noted Trump chose to criticize the Affordable Care Act when he himself faced criticism over the proposed American Health Care Act of 2017, "Instead of giving a reasoned defense, he went for blunt offense, which is a hallmark of whataboutism."[4] NPR noted similarities in use of the tactic by Putin and Trump, "it's no less striking that while Putin's Russia is causing the Trump administration so much trouble, Trump nevertheless often sounds an awful lot like Putin".[4]