Regardless of what anyone imagines, Capeci is still better hooked in than ANYONE on these forums. But that doesn't mean he can't correct himself if needed. If you look at his track record, it's remarkably consistent, especially compared to most other OC writers. But are we now going to cherry pick the few times he's reversed himself as justification to ignore him? Seems similar to what some also do when they want to discredit the feds by pointing out Fat Tony being indicted as the boss.

Capeci even gave a qualifier this time - Peter Gotti is boss in name only - and that's still not good enough. Some people take it upon themselves to claim "there's no way he's getting any tribute." This reminds me of the people who claimed years ago that Peter Gotti wasn't the boss then either. And that nobody was kicking up to him. Never mind he was eventually indicted as the boss and information came out about him receiving tribute every week.

We should be grateful that we have guys like Capeci, Anastasia, or Robbins giving us info when possible. Without Capeci's article this week, we wouldn't know about the change at the top. I'll take Capeci's information on his worst day over the theories by forum posters which, frankly, have a godawful track record.