I'm gonna look into the hand that comments/actions by Obama/Holder had on the case and public reaction.
Was just saying that the livelihood of the article's author, as a republican strategist, is to criticize democrats in general and the president specifically.
I read the article anyway, I just don't think he made a strong enough case for what he was saying. If he did,I would have have conceded that. I conceded your points about the involvement of outsiders in the protests.I used to associate anarchists with protests about economic policies.
Comments about the background of the shooter, are just my Jersey roots showing. Gun and handgun laws here are strict relative to other states, so that influenced my thoughts on the background of the shooter(s).
