1 registered members (m2w),
114
guests, and 7
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,954
Posts1,073,781
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: BAM_233]
#811235
11/02/14 08:06 AM
11/02/14 08:06 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
I think Chubby Checker should be in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. He is not in either. The biggest oversight in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is Johnny Maestro. It's disgraceful that he's been snubbed all these years. That is really weird that Checker is not in. But, he is not alone sadly. Stevie Ray Vaughan, The Doobie Brothers, Lou Reed, Joe Cocker, Tina Turner (no idea if Ike is in or not), Jim Croce, etc are still waiting. Ike and Tina are in collectively. No reason to put Tina in by herelf. She had very limited success as a solo artist other than the What's Love Got To Do With It? years (mid '80s). I liked Jim Croce a lot. But the truth is, his career may have been too short. But he belongs based on talent alone. The other acts that you mention are deserving. Stevie Ray and Lou Reed may go in this year, though. If N.W.A. gets in, it's political correctness run amok. This year's nominees: http://www.gangsterbb.net/threads/ubbthr...fpart=1&q=1
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811297
11/02/14 12:05 PM
11/02/14 12:05 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
As I said above, I don't think Rose is electable, but one of the things that I think everyone has to keep in mind in this discussion is that Pete managed the Reds for four full seasons, and he brought them home in second place all four times. The next season, when he was suspended mid-season, was a mess for the Reds, but in their first Pete-less season the Reds stayed in first place wire to wire and swept the Series.
So Pete's conduct potentially affected multiple pennant races, and not just the Reds. I don't think you can just assume that Pete didn't throw any games as a manager, and figure that's enough. Part of manager's job is to look past the specfic game, to make sure players are rested, work young players into the lineup. There's a direct conflict between that responsibility and the gambler's impulse to win this bet right here, and I'm not sure that's not part of the reason the division went from LA to Houston to San Francisco to LA to San Francisco in those years. It sure didn't help, though.
Last edited by mustachepete; 11/02/14 12:06 PM.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811298
11/02/14 12:48 PM
11/02/14 12:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,021 far, northwest
Binnie_Coll
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,021
far, northwest
|
mustachepete, you are a very good thinker. and I agree with your post. now, we have another issue with the hall. that is the steroid era. I mean a-rod, mcquire, Conseco, Clemens, bonds, and others. the cheaters. I wouldn't let them in either. and, furthermore their records should not be allowed. selig erred for not dealing with the problem. he should have been on top of it.
how do you stand on this steroid situation?
" watch what you say around this guy, he's got a big mouth" sam giancana to an outfit soldier about frank Sinatra. [ from the book "my way"
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811329
11/02/14 02:54 PM
11/02/14 02:54 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
The steroid issue is much tougher to deal with imo. While i personally think that until evidence can be shown that Rose threw games, he should be allowed; with Steroids it's not exactly clear who did and didn't take them and what effect they took from them. I mean what if Clemens, Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, etc are banned and a few elite players like Griffey Jr, Maddux, R.Johnson, etc make it simply because they were never caught? Just to clarify i'm not accusing any of those guys, it's just difficult to be sure with how messed up that era was.
Also with Bonds in particular it's even more difficult because he was on his way to a HOF career before he started juicing. From all accounts i've read Bonds started around 98, without the roids he obviously wouldn't have set the single season or all time HR records, or have beat Babe Ruths single season Slugging % record. Still he was hitting 30 HR's and Stealing 30 Bases every year before he started using Steroids.
This is just my opinion and i know most will disagree with it, but i think these guys should be personally punished; as in charges brought against them if warrented and a lifetime ban from Baseball, but a Hall of Fame without Rose, Bonds and Clemens just seems weird. Mcgwire can stay out he pretty much admitted to taking them his full career and Power Hitting seemed to be pretty much all he done.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Camarel]
#811343
11/02/14 03:22 PM
11/02/14 03:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
BAM_233
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
|
The steroid issue is much tougher to deal with imo. While i personally think that until evidence can be shown that Rose threw games, he should be allowed; with Steroids it's not exactly clear who did and didn't take them and what effect they took from them. I mean what if Clemens, Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, etc are banned and a few elite players like Griffey Jr, Maddux, R.Johnson, etc make it simply because they were never caught? Just to clarify i'm not accusing any of those guys, it's just difficult to be sure with how messed up that era was.
Also with Bonds in particular it's even more difficult because he was on his way to a HOF career before he started juicing. From all accounts i've read Bonds started around 98, without the roids he obviously wouldn't have set the single season or all time HR records, or have beat Babe Ruths single season Slugging % record. Still he was hitting 30 HR's and Stealing 30 Bases every year before he started using Steroids.
This is just my opinion and i know most will disagree with it, but i think these guys should be personally punished; as in charges brought against them if warrented and a lifetime ban from Baseball, but a Hall of Fame without Rose, Bonds and Clemens just seems weird. Mcgwire can stay out he pretty much admitted to taking them his full career and Power Hitting seemed to be pretty much all he done. I agree with this, and many are being punished because they were part of the era. That era is a big mess, and who knows if any mentioned above will be in. Unless of course somebody already in Cooperstown took them (I believe there were rumors or speculation about Henderson). Also, I believe that Bud Selig should be banned from Cooperstown as well.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: BAM_233]
#811357
11/02/14 04:08 PM
11/02/14 04:08 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
The steroid issue is much tougher to deal with imo. While i personally think that until evidence can be shown that Rose threw games, he should be allowed; with Steroids it's not exactly clear who did and didn't take them and what effect they took from them. I mean what if Clemens, Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, etc are banned and a few elite players like Griffey Jr, Maddux, R.Johnson, etc make it simply because they were never caught? Just to clarify i'm not accusing any of those guys, it's just difficult to be sure with how messed up that era was.
Also with Bonds in particular it's even more difficult because he was on his way to a HOF career before he started juicing. From all accounts i've read Bonds started around 98, without the roids he obviously wouldn't have set the single season or all time HR records, or have beat Babe Ruths single season Slugging % record. Still he was hitting 30 HR's and Stealing 30 Bases every year before he started using Steroids.
This is just my opinion and i know most will disagree with it, but i think these guys should be personally punished; as in charges brought against them if warrented and a lifetime ban from Baseball, but a Hall of Fame without Rose, Bonds and Clemens just seems weird. Mcgwire can stay out he pretty much admitted to taking them his full career and Power Hitting seemed to be pretty much all he done. I agree with this, and many are being punished because they were part of the era. That era is a big mess, and who knows if any mentioned above will be in. Unless of course somebody already in Cooperstown took them (I believe there were rumors or speculation about Henderson). Also, I believe that Bud Selig should be banned from Cooperstown as well. Agreed with everything you said here. I'd never heard of the Henderson rumours, i really hope that's all they were, rumours. The biggest problem that era has caused is the questioning of every single player practically. Another player i've read rumours about is Nolan Ryan, mostly stemming from his unusally long career as a pitcher (or in general) and his post 40 success. Hendersons Base Stealing records may have also have called him into question, unless there's more to it?
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811361
11/02/14 04:21 PM
11/02/14 04:21 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471 No. Virginia
mustachepete
Special
|
Special
Underboss
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,471
No. Virginia
|
now, we have another issue with the hall. that is the steroid era. I mean a-rod, mcquire, Conseco, Clemens, bonds, and others. the cheaters. I wouldn't let them in either. and, furthermore their records should not be allowed. selig erred for not dealing with the problem. he should have been on top of it.
how do you stand on this steroid situation? There's the old saying about Vietnam: if you're not confused, you don't understand the situation. That's the steroids to me - on the one hand McGwire has 11% of the vote, on the other his manager in Oakland and St Louis walks in on the first ballot. It's ridiculous. Basically, I'm in favor of rewriting the rule, "Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played," to something sportswriters can deal with. Make it clear that "sportsmanship" means that you didn't spike guys for fun, and get rid of the words integrity and character unless you want to have ethicists do an initial screening or something.
"All of these men were good listeners; patient men."
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: mustachepete]
#811362
11/02/14 04:25 PM
11/02/14 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
Make it clear that "sportsmanship" means that you didn't spike guys for fun, and get rid of the words integrity and character unless you want to have ethicists do an initial screening or something. There you go. This way the moralists (most of whom are hypocrites anyway) can't hijack the whole thing.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Camarel]
#811370
11/02/14 05:06 PM
11/02/14 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
BAM_233
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
|
The steroid issue is much tougher to deal with imo. While i personally think that until evidence can be shown that Rose threw games, he should be allowed; with Steroids it's not exactly clear who did and didn't take them and what effect they took from them. I mean what if Clemens, Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, etc are banned and a few elite players like Griffey Jr, Maddux, R.Johnson, etc make it simply because they were never caught? Just to clarify i'm not accusing any of those guys, it's just difficult to be sure with how messed up that era was.
Also with Bonds in particular it's even more difficult because he was on his way to a HOF career before he started juicing. From all accounts i've read Bonds started around 98, without the roids he obviously wouldn't have set the single season or all time HR records, or have beat Babe Ruths single season Slugging % record. Still he was hitting 30 HR's and Stealing 30 Bases every year before he started using Steroids.
This is just my opinion and i know most will disagree with it, but i think these guys should be personally punished; as in charges brought against them if warrented and a lifetime ban from Baseball, but a Hall of Fame without Rose, Bonds and Clemens just seems weird. Mcgwire can stay out he pretty much admitted to taking them his full career and Power Hitting seemed to be pretty much all he done. I agree with this, and many are being punished because they were part of the era. That era is a big mess, and who knows if any mentioned above will be in. Unless of course somebody already in Cooperstown took them (I believe there were rumors or speculation about Henderson). Also, I believe that Bud Selig should be banned from Cooperstown as well. Agreed with everything you said here. I'd never heard of the Henderson rumours, i really hope that's all they were, rumours. The biggest problem that era has caused is the questioning of every single player practically. Another player i've read rumours about is Nolan Ryan, mostly stemming from his unusally long career as a pitcher (or in general) and his post 40 success. Hendersons Base Stealing records may have also have called him into question, unless there's more to it? I thought that Canseco said something around the time Henderson was being inducted. But, I did find this interesting report. Does not say or speculate which player though. I honestly would think it would be a teammate of Canesco. http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/0...e-hall-of-fame/
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: BAM_233]
#811373
11/02/14 05:38 PM
11/02/14 05:38 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
The steroid issue is much tougher to deal with imo. While i personally think that until evidence can be shown that Rose threw games, he should be allowed; with Steroids it's not exactly clear who did and didn't take them and what effect they took from them. I mean what if Clemens, Sosa, Mcgwire, Bonds, etc are banned and a few elite players like Griffey Jr, Maddux, R.Johnson, etc make it simply because they were never caught? Just to clarify i'm not accusing any of those guys, it's just difficult to be sure with how messed up that era was.
Also with Bonds in particular it's even more difficult because he was on his way to a HOF career before he started juicing. From all accounts i've read Bonds started around 98, without the roids he obviously wouldn't have set the single season or all time HR records, or have beat Babe Ruths single season Slugging % record. Still he was hitting 30 HR's and Stealing 30 Bases every year before he started using Steroids.
This is just my opinion and i know most will disagree with it, but i think these guys should be personally punished; as in charges brought against them if warrented and a lifetime ban from Baseball, but a Hall of Fame without Rose, Bonds and Clemens just seems weird. Mcgwire can stay out he pretty much admitted to taking them his full career and Power Hitting seemed to be pretty much all he done. I agree with this, and many are being punished because they were part of the era. That era is a big mess, and who knows if any mentioned above will be in. Unless of course somebody already in Cooperstown took them (I believe there were rumors or speculation about Henderson). Also, I believe that Bud Selig should be banned from Cooperstown as well. Agreed with everything you said here. I'd never heard of the Henderson rumours, i really hope that's all they were, rumours. The biggest problem that era has caused is the questioning of every single player practically. Another player i've read rumours about is Nolan Ryan, mostly stemming from his unusally long career as a pitcher (or in general) and his post 40 success. Hendersons Base Stealing records may have also have called him into question, unless there's more to it? I thought that Canseco said something around the time Henderson was being inducted. But, I did find this interesting report. Does not say or speculate which player though. I honestly would think it would be a teammate of Canesco. http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/0...e-hall-of-fame/ Great article Bam thanks for thst. I know the comments on this are as good as citing YT comments, but the consensus seems to be that it's either about Wade Boggs or Roger Clemens. It seems a little weird how these allegations are so restricted to blogs. Here's a guy trying to analyze Boswells statement and come up with the most likely candidates; and he indeed says Henderson was the most likely; but he points out himself that he's largely relying on the fact that Henderson was Cansecos teammate. This was Boswells statement - "There was another player now in the Hall of Fame who literally stood with me and mixed something and I said "What's that?" and he said "it's a Jose Canseco milkshake". And that year that Hall of Famer hit more home runs than ever hit any other year.
So it wasn't just Canseco, and so one of the reasons that I thought that it was an important subject was that it was spreading. It was already spreading by 1988."
This is his opinion on Henderson and the link below it. This may stretch Boswell's definition a bit, but it technically fits. Rickey's 28 home runs in 1990 is indeed his career best, but he also hit the same number in 1986. Even so, I think the Rickey 1990 season fits Boswell's claim the best. After all, Rickey is the only one on this list who was an actual teammate of Canseco at the time he hit the home runs, and 1990 is really the height of the Bash Brothers and that Oakland squad. It'd also make some sense for Boswell, who had made Canseco and the A's a special subject of his, to be close enough to an Oakland player to be able to witness something like that.
I hope I don't need to say that I'm not actually accusing Rickey or Cal or Sandberg or anyone else of using steroids. I have no clue just how accurate or precise Boswell's claim was in the documentary. It's very possible that a more nuanced statement from Boswell would make this investigation completely worthless by the addition of just one key detail.
As it is, though, there are only eight possible players who he could be talking about. Of those eight, the three most likely candidates are Andre Dawson in his 1987 MVP season, Cal Ripken, Jr., in his 1991 MVP season or Rickey Henderson in his 1990 MVP season. Ryne Sandberg's 40 home run season in 1990 could also raise some eyebrows. It'd certainly be nice to hear Boswell, who has been investigating steroids in baseball longer than anyone and who obviously has some important inside knowledge, be a little more specific about what he knows, but that's probably not going to happen for a number of years still. In the meantime, all we can do is speculate over the hints that he drops.http://wezen-ball.com/2010-articles/what...milkshakeq.html
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811381
11/02/14 07:01 PM
11/02/14 07:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
bam, the link you gave says that Canseco said is wasn't Henderson. looks like he means ripken. that's sad. Why is it that you seem to vilify the rats in the organized crime section (like Gravano), yet you're ready to take the word of a piece of shit like Canseco in the sports section? Pretty inconsistent, don't you think? Ripken's an American hero. Canseco's a lying, drug-addled, Cuban dog.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811385
11/02/14 07:10 PM
11/02/14 07:10 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
Here's another random blog post that seems to think Ripken took steroids - http://www.truthfromfacts.com/2009/04/13/cal-ripken-and-steroids/ . In no way am i accusing Ripken but that random blog post brings up a few interesting points. For one Gehrigs, Ironman "unbeatable record" would've been alot more likely to break than Dimaggios "56 Game Record" for instance, because a bad night whether on steroids or not compared to just turning up to bat is a big difference. Here's a large part of the blog with the link below: So let’s talk about 1996. Remember that 1996 Oriole team? I do, because it was the first time as their fan they made the playoffs. You remember the ’96 team – it’s the one in which 12 year old Jeffrey Maier snatched a long Jeter drive from OF Tony Tarasco, making it a home run. But another highlight of that team and year is that every starter had 20 HR or more, and the Orioles set the then all time record for team home runs.
In 1996, Ripken hit over 50% more homeruns than he did in either of the previous 2 years, or for the rest of his playing career. In 1999, at age 39, he was repeatedly injured, but the .276 career batting average man had a smashing year statistically: .340 b.a., same number of doubles in that partial season as he hit in full seasons towards career end (27) (except for ’96 when he had 40), and was on a 32 homeruns pace over a 600AB season (the most HR he ever had was 34, in his MVP year of 1991). Lest it be overlooked, Ripken holds the MLB consecutive games played streak, from May 30, 1982 – Sept 20, 1998. That huge guy (6’4″, 193cm) played the hardest position physically after pitcher and catcher, and kept the energy up for every game.
This proves nothing, but Ripken’s sidestepping the steriods question in 2006 doesn’t help make sense of his secure place during the steroids era.
But Cal’s remarks in 2006 are of the same ‘gee whiz’ nature that convicted steroid users use when lying about or minimizing extent of their usage, e.g.:
“I’m curious [whether McQuire used steroids], but I don’t feel that I’m in a position to judge,” Ripken said at the baseball winter meetings. “History will judge us all in some way. And, if you’re content with the truth coming out, then whether your judgment day is now or 50 years from now doesn’t matter.”
“A smarter person will have suspicions when you look around and see people coming back a lot bigger than they were,” he said. “I realize that steroids were an issue in other sports. But no way did I know it was as big as it’s starting to show it was.”
“I think we all were very disappointed that steroids came flying out into the game of baseball. The integrity of the game was in question,” Ripken said. “It’s sad that a cloud is over baseball. Maybe the whole story has not been told yet. I believe the story will come out in time.”
http://www.truthfromfacts.com/2009/04/13/cal-ripken-and-steroids/
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: pizzaboy]
#811386
11/02/14 07:12 PM
11/02/14 07:12 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809 Scotland
Camarel
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,809
Scotland
|
bam, the link you gave says that Canseco said is wasn't Henderson. looks like he means ripken. that's sad. Why is it that you seem to vilify the rats in the organized crime section (like Gravano), yet you're ready to take the word of a piece of shit like Canseco in the sports section? Pretty inconsistent, don't you think? Ripken's an American hero. Canseco's a lying, drug-addled, Cuban dog. Again just to clarif PB i'm not accusing Ripken of anything, just reading various accounts from this era and trying to make sense of this mess.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Camarel]
#811387
11/02/14 07:17 PM
11/02/14 07:17 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
bam, the link you gave says that Canseco said is wasn't Henderson. looks like he means ripken. that's sad. Why is it that you seem to vilify the rats in the organized crime section (like Gravano), yet you're ready to take the word of a piece of shit like Canseco in the sports section? Pretty inconsistent, don't you think? Ripken's an American hero. Canseco's a lying, drug-addled, Cuban dog. Again just to clarif PB i'm not accusing Ripken of anything, just reading various accounts from this era and trying to make sense of this mess. I know that, Cam .
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Binnie_Coll]
#811390
11/02/14 07:22 PM
11/02/14 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,021 far, northwest
Binnie_Coll
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 3,021
far, northwest
|
caramel, good link, no one will ever know, but, Canseco isn't the only one, who questions ripken. it would be sad if its true.
as big a hero that he is.
" watch what you say around this guy, he's got a big mouth" sam giancana to an outfit soldier about frank Sinatra. [ from the book "my way"
|
|
|
Re: does pete rose belong in the hall of fame.
[Re: Camarel]
#811404
11/02/14 10:10 PM
11/02/14 10:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
BAM_233
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,746
|
caramel, good link, no one will ever know, but, Canseco isn't the only one, who questions ripken. it would be sad if its true.
as big a hero that he is. That era has been completely 'tarred and feathered'. Until there's some way to completely clear certain players there will always be an asterisk at their name. One thing i've always been confused about is Ken Griffey Jr. escaping accusations, if he was totally clean then i think he deserves alot more consideration as one of the greatest ever. I only seen Griffey played during the later years of the Reds. I could be really wrong, but he looked the same body build wise as he did in Seattle. At this point I believe he was clean, and it's a big shame those injuries took a lot out of him. Another player that pretty much escaped accusations, and has been vocal about getting rid of steroids in the game is Frank Thomas. He also pretty much looked the same through out his career. Also, to PB. I take everything from Cancesco with a grain of salt. I still believe or want to believe that there are a lot of players who are not using.
|
|
|
|