Quote:
It was given to Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban. Ah yes, the Soviets. Which to choose to eliminate? Communism, terrorism, communism, terrorism.
Again, as Mr. Baggins so eloquently pointed out - the "Taliban" didn't exist, and we were providing aid against a rather nasty Soviet movement to control Afghanistan (which, in turn, could be why there is so much trouble in Chechnya).

We were at war with Russia, and not only that, they were taking over a soveriegn country.

Quote:
Let's say Clinton (I'm not saying he did) let Osama go.
Let's say it, because it's well documented, and acknowledged even by Clinton aides that he had 3 chances to take Bin Laden. So it's a fact.

Quote:
What about when we had Osama trapped and Dubya wanted us to use Afghani soldiers, who were with Osama only a month before, to go in and capture him?
M'kay...these people were now on our side. Not only that, why should we send our boys into a terrorist hotbed if we could utilize Afghani mercernaries...or maybe, in your lingo...thugs, to do our job for us.

Quote:
Answer my question. Do you think that 'f-ggot' has to mean gay, 100 % of the time?
Well gee, I never heard of it meaning any other connotation.

Double-J: "Mr. Baggins, you are such a ******!"

Mr. Baggins: "Bloody hell, thanks bro. You are too!"

Iceman: "Yo **** , word life!"

Double-J: "Listen **** , you guys totally rule!"

:rolleyes:

---

Quote:
Ok, so I was 2 for 3 and you were 1 for 3. Thanks.
Does this make you feel special that I'm only contesting one of your numbers, considering most of your other "facts" that you have posted throughout this thread (and others) have been countered with real facts?

That makes it BB Revolution 1 bajillion, Pat 2. We'd definitely 0wn if this was Fantasy Debate.


Quote:
Exactly.
Exactly wrong.

Quote:
Do you want to talk about stations calling election results? [Big Grin] Two words and a year for you:
Florida, FOX, 2000
And guess what? They we're right, as opposed to the other stations. And again, you're not refuting my point.


Quote:
What does a liberal not associated with the media have to do with your argument? If I wanted 'fair and balanced' out of Fox's slogan, could I get in the USA Today?
My point is that the left, which has dominated the media industry for so long, is so paranoid about Fox that they are resorting to legal tactics to try and attack them, since they certainly can't do it in Neilsen ratings.

Quote:
I don't support abortions. I support a woman's right to choose what she wants to do with her body, as I have been saying. BTW, I already answered your question.
1.) The choice/right IS abortion. :rolleyes:
2.) No, you haven't answered, I asked for some form of justification that womb expulsion brings life, either cited, or explained to me.


Quote:
I answered this already too. Dubya thinks with 'war on his mind' and, after all, this 'is the guy who tried to kill his dad.'
At least he thinks...unlike a certain debate partner I have...

Quote:
The truth hurts. Let it sink in and wrap a warm towel around your head. It'll help. -
Where is the truth? You've been wrong :p

Why don't you try reading a history book, and economics book, and stop trying to debate with the mentality of a high school student who was taught by a clearly biased teacher.

Why don't you go open a textbook on "Basic Thuganomics," it'll help.

Regards,
That Double-J Person