You can, but that doesn't mean it's terribly relevant. Knock yourself out.

Again, like I said in the other post - I don't think democracy, in the long run will work. However, I don't think it would've been responsible or logical to whack Saddam and his sons, and appoint another leader that would have no clout with the people. Maybe if the international community wouldn't be such a bunch of p*ssies, they would come to the table and encourage the elections and we can pull out of there asap.

Yes. But you're saying that we should've continued diplomacy with Saddam but also go after Kim Jong Il?

I haven't said Saddam was involved in 9/11, though I have no doubts in my mind he was connected one way or another, either with Al Queda, or some other monetary contribution.

Again, I don't understand why you still feel the need to go into N.Korea while we're still using diplomacy (btw why have you eliminated Sudan from your argument?)


I'd say very/highly likely. If your system was in enacted, I think it would be even more likely.

But it is a living organism.

That makes sense. So I guess it's not a gun until you open the package and shoot it? Or it's not a condom until you stick it on your dick?

The stance of abortionists is so absolutely repugnant, I'm surprised that they have any morals at all. As a people, when we have condoned the death of our own, is a sad era.

You can take any biological name you choose, I know them all. Zygote, feel free to debate that as well.

The fact remains that it is a 46 chromosomed being that has a unique genetic code, carries out life functions, grows, and is wholly sentient. The argument that it "isn't human" has very little, if any, scientific or logical backbone, which is why I find it very disturbing people that people accept this putrid rationalization of murder.

Major overhaul.

Yes, "freedom" for a woman of bearing a child, and unwarrented, rationalized murder for an innocent, sentient being.

Regards,
Double-J