You take evertyhing out of it's context and rely on one-liners to keep up in debates.

I meant Castro wasn't as bad as Saddam in his own ruling, i.e. genocide, not hatred for us.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was 40 years ago, Pat, and we didn't have intelligence that said he had WMD's.
There were terrorists in Iraq!!!! This is angering me. The regime, for one, were terrorists. There were Al Quaida, Hammas, etc. connections with Saddam in abundance!
The terrorists come in VAST majority from Mid East, hence a Mid East haven for them to train, operate, get weapons, etc. is more of a concern then a place half way around the world from their hot spots.


Yeah, the Gulf War. And after that war, he remained in power, people continued to die, and he had technology enough to create such weapons. I'd stop repeating myself if you'd stop falsifying reasons to go to Iraq.

So some blacks ansd Hispanics are just simply dumber than whites? Okay... but "same for whites?" What are you talking about? Some white people are plain dumber than white people but not as much? I'm lost.

No, it's not a nice thing, Pat. True however, considering your view that "some" Black people and Hispanics are just naturally dumber than White people.

I'm not. If I am, I didn't even see his comment. I'm simply stating a fact-- the world has been spitting on us for a long time, disliking us, and for what?

Do some research, pal. Chirac is as corrupt as they come. He's good friends with Saddam, and has done major business with him, selling him weapons, jets. And I'm not talking about the 70's or 80's business, I'm talking business right before Operation Iraqi Freedom. Chirac hates America, and constantly undermines us.

Like what? Iraq? Good one.

No, not in the context of what your comment was. you said:
"Because sending troops into a country to kill people (i.e. Iraq) doesn't solve anything. The country needs money so its' army can fight off the rebels and stop the starvation."
Same thing is happening in Sudan. It's genocide, and it's stopped by sending in soldiers. I don't see how sending these guys money is different than sending Jews or Poland money in WWII.


No, I'm saying you're uninformed about the regime of Saddam Hussein. You don't know a lot about it is what I'm saying. It seems to me you aren't familiar with the terrorist ties it had or how it operated.

Yeah, now go out and stop it. It's not exactly specific enough to get the problem ironed out. Airport security, Arab people extra screening, etc. would've helped though. Nevertheless, Clinton had 8 years Bush had 8 months so don't blame it on Bush like so many liberals do. After all, if we're going to point at Bush for getting memos linked to Bin laden, let's not forget Clinton's turned down offer from Sudan to get Bin laden turned over to the Saudi government.

Again, you take it out of context. You commented on NK and Iran having WMDs and we weren't sure about Iraq. I said we were sure, which we were, from CIA and MI6 intel. Turns out, it was bad intel.

Blame the CIA and British Intel and Russian Intel, then because they got the intelligence reports. Bush and his Cabinet aren't out in the field disguised or operating sattelite imagery of the Mid East. Yeah, it's up to him to go to war, and.... you're not really connecting your dots. One-liners.... tsk tsk.


I won't even direct you to a site, since you'll make it biased. Off the top of my head, Saddam trained Hamas members, he trained Abu Abbas,Abu Nidal, he gave asylum to Al-Zarqawi ( the Al Quaida # 2 in charge guy and the man responsible for all the beheadings in IRAQ) and gave him medical treatment, let him open up a terror training camp in Iraq.

One site that covers a few of the ties is this:
Saddam-Terrorist Connections

Man... have you ever heard of Google or a library? Just look it up I'm tired of checking my sources when I type.


No sweat in that is can be done by us. UK cannot do what we can in employing huge Armies across the world, and fast. We have larger numbers and better technology, that's why we went led the Iraq war. Vietnam was totally unecessary and a huge mistake.

Alright. You obviously won't toy with the idea that Eminem and his pals aren't good for society or morals. If you think that is an insult to your beliefs, fine. I think Eminem (and his type) is a thug with no morality.... oohh, what a remorseless thing to say. I'll take TV Land morals, thanks.


If you won't talk with me anymore, fine. Let's leave it at this. Any unbiased 3rd party can come through, read our posts, and make up their own decision on who won this debate.