Why would a 6 year old need to know? You need to be 18 to vote. 'Some quiz' will show people if you're intelligent enough to vote for someone because you support them for what they think, rather then just thinking one is better then the other for no reason.

Bush was given information about "Bin Laden hijacking planes," but either failed to understand them or to take it serious. So, in all seriousness, 9/11 could've been prevented.

And what about all of the proof that Iran and North Korea have WMDS? We KNOW that they have them, especially North Korea. We were uncertain about Iraq. Why enter Iraq (which was questionable about WMD) when we have 2 other countries that we KNOW have WMDS?

You mean, for HIS advantage. It was HIS intelligence. I'm sure Bush knew that some intelligence was accurate and some wasn't. If Bush wouldn't have rushed into Iraq, then I don't think a lot of people would dislike the Iraq war, but he DID rush into the war, which is why more and more men keep dying each day.

I'm not saying we should go to North Korea right NOW. I'm saying that they were/are more of a threat then Saddam and Iraq.

Kim Jong has made open threats against the US and the US has NEVER EVER gave him money. We gave Saddam billions and billions. Saddam used the money we gave him to buy all of his palaces etc. It's a totally different situation. I have the impression that there's something the US government is trying to cover up.

Why were you ok with America sending troops to Iraq first? You obviously believe that Saddam had WMDS. If he had them, then why was he only a threat to the US? Why didn't the UK go in first if he was such a threat to the world?

Is that supposed to be a joke? You're spitting in the face of people who don't have the money to escape the cities and get into a good school. It's like you don't want anybody to go on with life if they can't get a good education, yet you don't have any solutions (nor does Bush) on how we can help them now, before it's too late.

Because that is how America works. There are taxes. We could use that $225 billion that Bush spent on the war with no cause, but, oh wait, too late.

But it should excuse you for criticizing people on welfare. These are the people who will be on welfare. If you aren't willing to help them now, then it will really cost these tax payers (that you seem to feel sympathy for) so much in the future.

Ok. Then why do over half of the high school drop outs happen to be minorities? What's the problem? You tell me.

Big business? Over 95 % of business are SMALL businesses. There are barely any big businesses in America. The small businesses represent over 50 % of working people. Why should the other half and the 5 % of big businesses get off easy?

It's going to skyrocket no matter what, in these next 4 years.

Um. I didn't say that.

The only people who I believe should be in jail for life with no parole are people who commit murder. Everyone else can be re-educated, rehabilitated, and brought back into society.

I don't feel anyone with mental problems should be held accountable unless they know what they're doing and the court can prove without a reasonable doubt that they knew it. This is why people that are retarded and have the IQ of a child shouldn't be put on death row or sentenced to life in prison.

I don't find that amusing, as you seem to. People don't realize how addicted they are. These people actually get sick if they don't do a drug they're addicted to. The government should give them one chance to clean themselves up in a rehab. If they mess up after being completely clean, then they go to prison.

Because we try to control them and their oil fields. And do you honestly think that it's just the Middle East that hates us? The whole world hates us, but hey, there's a great quote: "Don't hate me because I'm American. Just hate my government. And the President."

Because sending troops to Iraq and sending them to Sudan are two TOTALLY different things. There is no one to defend the Sudanese people against the rebels.

Do you think the rebels would be able to fight off artillery and armor that the US have?

Ok. For some reason, you think I'm talking about strictly trade when I say outsource. I'm referring to American jobs that the President takes away, sends overseas, hires a foreigner, and then pays them 25 % of what the American worker would get here.

Powell Admits Bush Supports Outsourcing
http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/read.asp?fn=df05212004.html
http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/read.asp?fn=df03172004.html
http://www.misleader.org/daily_mislead/read.asp?fn=df03102004.html

Because the US gave us 2 reasons to enter Iraq:
1.) Get rid of Saddam because he commits genocide.
2.) Get WMDS

Since there are no WMDS, we are in there right now strictly to get in a new President who 'won't commit genocide,' yet we don't want to help the Sudanese where there is genocide now.