If you believe that these Law Enforcement agencies DON'T use misinformation techniques then your pretty naive.
Nobody suggests that. Merely that it with the conjunction of indictment and court dockets is on average more reliable than a self-professed internet mobster that selectively ignores information when it doesn't suit him.
This.
Why would I NOT ignore, or at least question, information which by the sourses own admission, may well be false?
Why is this so hard to understand.
I don't have an agenda, I know what I know which is not everything, far from it, my point is here, that to depend on a source whos own authors openly admit are laced with lies, borders on the retarded
