I've wondered and this is in comparison to Michael Mancuso and Vinny Gorgeous...Vinny got a life sentence for ordering a murder or two. Michael Mancuso physically killed his wife got only 10 years then only got 15 for ordering a murder.

Aside from that, it seems mobsters are sent to jail 15-20 years just on extortion charges and union corruption and RICO charges without any violent charges. I think crimes like book making and union corruption should not carry that long of sentences. Extortion...maybe but like in the massimino case/charge in philly he got 15 years...seems ridiculous and unconstitutional

eh i knwo what your saying but union corruption can hurt people in a big way, and extortion can too. imagine if someone was taking half of your paycheck weekly and then they become a "partner" and run you out until your bankrupt im sure you would want their head

I think it's because they think (don't know how often this is with a good reason though) that most mafiosi have killed at least somebody during their career, so if they aren't able to prove it, then they are going to make them pay an excessively harsh price for minor crimes, so it's as if they were doing time for murder. Just like with the Al Capone stereotype.

Well maybe not extortion haha but 10-15 years for illegal gambling attached to a RICO charge.. Pretty unjust

I think it's too easy with murder sentences. Don't know if this is true, but I read that prosecutors don't want to pursue the death penalty against mobsters. Joe Massino was an exception and he flipped. I'd bet others would also flip.

There are guys on death row for doing less than many convicted mobsters. And most murders with LCN are in the first degree category.

The last "gangster" to be executed was Lepke Buchalter, and that was in 1944.

You'll almost never get a New York City jury (especially outer borough juries like Brooklyn or here in the Bronx) to vote yes to death at sentencing. That's why the sentencing phase of Vinny Basciano's trial was such a farce. They were NEVER going to get that sentence in Brooklyn. Not in a million years.

The prosecutors finally got one through a few months ago, though. That piece of shit cop killer Ronell Wilson was sentenced to death in Brooklyn federal court. Scumbag. If they were to put his execution on pay per view, I'd pay for everyone here to watch it .

Also, John "Cockeye" Dunn, in 1949.

You're right, Dwalin. I forgot about Dunn. But you get what I'm saying. Either way, it's been over sixty years. And you're not likely to see a wiseguy executed in the next sixty. Not in New York, anyway.

yeah the philly guys were facing the chair for the frankie flowers hit but didnt happen

Funny they sought death penalty for vinny gorgeous and he didnt even actually kill anyone...probably just thought he was a huge fag, which he is.

Many of the sentences are too harsh.A couple of shining examples off of the top of my head are : Luciano getting 30 to 50 because a handful of his guys were running around using his name to get brothels to kick in to the protection pot and Salerno getting 100 years for being the Boss of a family he wasn't even the Boss of.The rates at which bail are denied and assets are seized through the forfeiture provisions of the RICO(and CSA)laws are a bit over the top too.I'm sorry if I've offended any Saints amongst us,but sometimes I think the politicians of the past 100 years have more in common with the Politburo of the USSR than the Founding Fathers.

what about somebody getting 10 years for one rock

larry hoover got 200 years for one murder and 6 life sentences for being the leader of a continuing criminal enterprise

mobsters get off kinda easy sometimes

Moussie in Philly may have been arrested over 30 times in his career but he just got 16 years for video poker machines and sharking...
Maybe a bad example bc philly judges probably said enough is enough but think about that 16 years for poker machines that will be legal before long

I think a big part of the sentencing mob guys get has to do With the fact that the judges and DAs know these guys commit crimes almost daily. They always try to send them up for the max for all te shit they don't get caught doing.

I'd say the sentencing is skewed. That Bonanno gambling ring that was netting 50 Mil a year, how many years did they get?

I know the guy Albert Reed only got a year and a day for his 5 BILLION operation in Texas. Come on man!

This is because it is part of the criminal "enterprise". The enterprise is recognized as consistently engaging in criminal activities. Whether or not a guy gets hit with a big sentence for bookmaking is beside the point; he is still a member of, and supporter of, an organization that murders, robs, distributes narcotics, extorts, and engages in labor fraud, among other things.

An independent bookie is not going to see as harsh a sentence because he isn't part of a larger group of criminals committing other crimes.

The minute an independent bookie lays off with a "connected one" he's fucked (if someone's watching). THAT isn't fair.

Judges are supposed to FIRST look at the statute. What does it say (sentencing guidelines). Only after that are they allowed to use their discretion in carrying out sentencing. Just what my Legislation and Regulation professor told me in 1L.

They got the Mafia Cops, Eppolito and Carracappa, on the continuous criminal enterprise loophole. From what I understand, they are both serving life sentences because Fatty sold an ounce of meth to an undercover agent in Vegas. And the prosecutor reached with a CCE charge, connecting their NYC activities with Vegas. Otherwise the statute of limitations would have expired, I believe. Then after being found guilty, the judge tossed out the verdict because they couldn't prove a CCE, and that was also later overturned. Its very confusing.

Can anyone explain what happened in more detail?

Check out the story of George Martorano he got banged with life no chance of parol.

^ This is why the sentences are harsher and should be.

Some of the sentances are way too harsh, some are deserved. The punishment phase is a bigger problem, like locking John Gotti in solitary all those years, not letting him proper medical care, and maintaining those conditions even as he was dying and helpless. For the white collar crimes the sentances are too harshwhen person convited has any accustaion of Mafa ties. Same holds true for gambling convictions. For murders there should be one rule for everyone.

An equally troubling thing is the leniency extended to murderers who testify. Sammy The Bull Gravano admitted to 20 murders, the five years he received was not the appropiate sentance for him. They should have offered him one year for each murder, with chance of parole before the entire sentence was done. And even that would be lenient.

What if he, as part of enterprise, has never engaged or had knowledge of the more serious crimes? When someone is convicted of number running, they should be sentanced only for that, not what others may have done or have done. It is why RICO law should be unconstitutional, and I think it eventually will be.

well thats where the whole rico conspiracy comes in play. even if you dont commit any crimes if your getting the fruits from the crime/ aka getting money kicked up to you your guilty for the crime too, just like luciano with the prostitution thing.

If you are part of the enterprise you kick up to capos and family administration types who use that money to fund other illegal enterprises. It doesn't matter the severity of the crime. You are part of the criminal machine. The mob has been broken down because of these harsh sentences and RICO enterprise statutes. I'd say it's served it's purpose as far as loosening the stranglehold that organized crime held on New York, Chicago, and other cities for the better part of five decades.

Who is on death row for doing less than convicted mobsters?

Some of the sentences are ridiculous. They get 15 years for gambling. I've seen murderers and rapists get much less time. Tell me which is the more serious crime.

1. taking bets on football games
2. raping a woman
3. robbing and shooting a clerk in the head
4. drunk driving and killing a family of four

They obviously have a huge hard on for these guys and want to see some get nailed bad...look at staino in Philly, big sentence for non violent crimes with no priors ..

But is there any information, even not proved one, whether Staino ever killed anyone? Because I still think that the zeal with which they prosecute mobsters for minor crimes is that they are sure they are guilty of something serious which can't be proven (not saying I agree that's always the case, but I think that's how they reason). For example, Luigi Manocchio in Providence got 5 years for extortion of strip clubs nobody cares about, but everybody knows that he was prosecuted (and not convicted) for 2 murders in the 60s.

Well they know he's made I'm sure (staino) so probably try and throw as much as possible and see what sticks .. The DAs could put together a case for basically anything and rope as many people in and try and get someone to flip on other crimes ... Such a waste of money when in a town like Philly the real crime is in north Philly

Is Kaboni Savage from there? (still can't believe it how suitable his surname is for him)