It might have been obvious in your mind, but we aren't mind readers. You needed to be clear and you were not. I don't presume to know what you're thinking as you shouldn't presume to know what I'm thinking. We're arguing both philosophical and legal issues here, so arguments have to be precise to be understood accurately.

How the public reacts shows how little you understand logical reasoning. An argument isn't true because it's popular. Opinions are fluid and easily changeable, easily influenced. If want a popularity contest, don't debate philosophy.

It was already obvious that you agreed with Roe and didn't agree with me on it, so what you wrote was either pointless or confused. It made more sense for it to be in error with a word left out, but you wanted it to be pointless. If you want to restate what really is obvious, well that's your right.