dontomasso and other far left wing extremists don't want to amend the Constitution, they want to interpret it in ways that are totally foreign to its original meaning. It's like taking a steak dinner from a restaurant's menu and saying it really means soy burger. Notice how he brings in contraception as if there's any possibility of that happening. It's far left scare tactics that are devoid of any truth or reality.

Then dontomasso writes: "Of course there is no right to beat children, that's a huge stretch. There is a right however for consenting adults to do what they want in the privacy of their homes so long as they are not causing danger to one another.

The right to privacy necessarily entails a restriction on governmental interference in people's personal affairs. I would think a true conservative would be in favor of this."

While he says that beating children is a huge stretch (ignoring the huge stretch he made when he brought up contraception), he overlooks his own words "causing danger to one another." A baby being killed is the ultimate danger. And by the way, babies aren't being murdered in people's bedrooms, but in stale abortion clinics. He sort of gets what conservative wants about governmental interference in personal affairs (by the way, where are the complaints about Obama's spying that far exceeded what Bush did?) but forgets that it stops when someone is harmed. The ultimate harm is being murdered. The straw man creating a phony conservative argument overlooks the harm caused to the developing baby.

Finally, dontomasso recognizes the fundamental lie of the penumbra that was created out of thin air, yet he defends the lie in the face of his scare story of states taking away contraception. Even Justice Brennan's own clerk, Edward Lazarus, saw through that fraud. It's the Dred Scott case of the 20th century and the far left defends it.