You're absolutely right, I do!!

Thus proving the guy will say whatever he needs to at any given time to get votes.

Which means he's a shameless panderer.

Which means he has no core beliefs or convictions.

Which means he doesn't get my vote.



Apple

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the war room.

[/b][/quote] Although I like American version of English I still want to call soccer football, at least soccer has more foot in it!

I just heard that this Commies for Kerry BS is the makings of a Fox reporter named Carl Cameron, who is the same culprit behind the fake Kerry quotes he had. I'll find a link later, I have to go to class. But with most of you being Fox viewers, you wouldn't give a damn.

So what are you trying to say? That John Kerry supports the Communist Party of America?

It's an absolutely ludicrous argument, and another classic instance of misdirection from a real issue in an effort to minimize the real issue.

The fact that Communists support Kerry does not mean that Kerry supports the idealoligies of the Communists as much as Bush supporting his neo-Nazi fan base (don't kid yourself that there aren't a lot of neo-Nazis favoring Bush, even if they are holding their noses to do it [just as CPUSA holds its nose to favor Kerry] considering the gleanings from a Stormfront White Nationalist Community message board).

While it is possible that the communist party is supporting Kerry (I don't know or care either way), the link to the website is not for a group that supports Kerry. Read the following article from FOXnews.com. Communists for Kerry is a group that is supporting Bush's re-election.


Trail Tales: Polls, Gaffes and Videotape
Sunday, October 03, 2004


He's for Whom?

With the election just 30 days away, the presidential candidates aren't punch drunk yet, but they ought to be. Surely, this press outlet has gotten a little stir crazy, so much to the point that it had trouble keeping track of the players last week. Chalk it up to a "527" wake-up call.

First were the usual suspects who were clear about where they stood, OK, no problem. Then came the Billionaires for Bush, but they're actually supporting Kerry. After that came Communists for Kerry; they're seemingly working, albeit in an unorthodox way, to re-elect Bush.

For a Friday report on this Web site following the first Bush-Kerry debate, a member of Communists for Kerry managed to persuade a FOXNews.com reporter that he was indeed a Kerry supporter. His true feelings subsequently were misrepresented in a story that was published here over the weekend.

FOXNews.com regrets the error. From now on, polygraphs for everybody