Originally Posted By: Louiebynochi
Michael Genovese wasnt indicted does that mean he wasn't the boss
Vincent loscalzo inducted John Mamone into the trafficante family in 1995 and received tribute from his gambling loan sharking and drugs
But loacalzo wasn't indicted, does that mean none of it ever happened???
John difronzo started jks and his car dealerships and bought his buildings with mob money, and yet he wasnt indicted for money laundering does that mean it didn't happen.

Those Cleveland guys that were loan sharking and pressuring that guy at mcCormic involved with Rudy fratto. Those cleveland guys were never indicted
What about the Cleveland mob guys that gave the Lamborghini to the Philly crew. Those Cleveland guys weren't indicted. Does that mean it didn't happen???


The point your trying to make might be valid in the short term. However, as time goes by, it becomes weaker and weaker. If you stretch your way of thinking out long enough, somebody can claim this or that is going on forever; regardless of the lack of evidence. Your entire argument is based on hypotheticals, louie. Are you going to be making the same argument in another ten years if/when we still haven't seen any political or labor cases involving the Chicago mob? It's the same problem you have with the Detroit and Buffalo families. How much time has to go by before you finally write them off?

Quote:
Matassa jr is a felon and is draining the funds from the transit union
Does that mean its not happening
Do you think matassa jr does any illegal activity with this union???
Is he not a member of the mob?? He wasn't indicted???did it not happen???


Matassa is "draining the funds" from the union? And we know this how? Because he's a mobster and that's what mobsters do with unions? Sure, plenty have. But you're adding 1+1 and getting 3 in this case. More hypotheticals.


Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.