The child in question was 8, correct? As a parent, I would never, ever advocate or support such a serious effect that a sex change operation would have upon a child who is not able to understand the potential profound effects of such a medical procedure that is entirely optional.
He is only taking hormone blockers at this point. He has not had any surgery yet.
Quote:
HOW HORMONE BLOCKING WORKS:
Tammy Lobel's hormones are being blocked by an implant on the inside of the 11-year-old's upper left arm, which must be replaced once a year.
Ms Moreno explained: 'In other words, she will stay as a pre-pubescent boy until she decides and we feel that she can make this decision about surgery.'
His parents say the hormone treatment will give him time to figure out if he wants to fully transition to being female or go through puberty as a boy.
By age 14 or 15 the device will need to be removed so that Tammy can go through puberty, Ms Moreno said.
If he chooses to stop taking the drugs, he will undergo natural male puberty at a later stage and his future fertility would not be impacted.
Should their son decide to transition to an adult female, he can take female hormones as well, which would raise his voice, allow him to grow breasts and develop other feminine physical characteristics.
Well, if what you posted about the process is accurate, that's a different story. However, I am concerned about the influence of the parents upon child that may be skewed toward advocating gender change. It's one thing to promote my children's aspirations during their formative years to be engineer, doctors, or athletes; it's quite another to promote or even to acquiesce in the face of their aspirations to change their gender.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
