1 registered members (1 invisible),
122
guests, and 32
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,472
Posts1,090,298
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: Jenkins]
#719353
06/07/13 11:26 PM
06/07/13 11:26 PM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 653 Illinois
F_white
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 653
Illinois
|
The capos may not had wanted all out war with gotti.Paul lost respect with the street crews but he was not a street guy,and everyone know that Lil Nicky was running the famly by time Peter become boss i think Peter was front boss of the feds
From now on, nothing goes down unless I'm involved. No blackjack no dope deals, no nothing. A nickel bag gets sold in the park, I want in. You guys got fat while everybody starved on the street. Now it's my turn.
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: Jenkins]
#719418
06/08/13 09:35 PM
06/08/13 09:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,146
abc123
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,146
|
Was the resentment towards Big Paul justified? Granted it is a different era, but look at John DiFronzo in Chicago. From what I read he sits back in his mansion and collects from his construction business. He isn't out there getting his hands dirty with his street guys. Why was Castellano resented for doing that? Was Ducks Corallo or Snake Persico busting their ass in the streets? Probably not. I bet you they were sitting back collecting the money just like Big Paul. Was the resentment towards Big Paul justified? I would say some part of why they hit him was because people was thinking he would rat in court his mansion was because he did run a meat place and could pay for it on the books the hit was justified in the eyes on the Gambino members and they did roll over right away. Probably Big Paul was going to kill gotti&Co but who's to say he was ?
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: Jenkins]
#719432
06/08/13 11:41 PM
06/08/13 11:41 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
Was the resentment towards Big Paul justified? Granted it is a different era, but look at John DiFronzo in Chicago. From what I read he sits back in his mansion and collects from his construction business. He isn't out there getting his hands dirty with his street guys. Why was Castellano resented for doing that? Was Ducks Corallo or Snake Persico busting their ass in the streets? Probably not. I bet you they were sitting back collecting the money just like Big Paul. Besides being seen as greedy, Castellano also didn't win any points when he gave his OK for the Genovese family to kill his captain in Connecticut. These, in themselves, were't enough for most of the guys in the family to do anything beyond gripe. But obviously many of them weren't all that sorry to see him go and fall in line behind the new leadership. Everyone knew what had happened but only Failla and Marino tried to do anything about it.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: Jenkins]
#719443
06/09/13 12:50 AM
06/09/13 12:50 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 258
AllDay27
Capo
|
Capo
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 258
|
It's all about who GETS to earn, not how they do it. Paul didn't want Gotti's crew dealing because he knew Gotti could takeover and if the crew kept earning he surely would(good call on Castellano's part) plus with Gene Gotti getting caught dealing Paul had an easy excuse to kill John his likely sucessor. Another thought is what would have possibly happened if the FBI hadn't wire tapped Ruggiero's crib and forced Gotti's hand in whacking Big Paul. Castellano was about to go down for LIFE in the commission trial, he didn't stick around long enough for sentencing, however, had he I am very curious what could have played out (i.e. Attempted commission power shift by other Families) as well as what the Gambino Family in full health with Big Paul getting life would have done. Would Castellano have been allowed to run the show form the jail, it's never been an issue for guys in the past but would the 1986 Gambino Family actually keep CASTELLANO (not your average boss doing life) in place doing life with Guys like Gotti, DeCicco, Armone, Gravano, DeBernardo on the street earning what they were, honestly Paul likely would have been shelved.
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#719602
06/10/13 02:05 AM
06/10/13 02:05 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,808
jace
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 3,808
|
Gravano might have been telling truth, or he could have been making it up. Conte and Castellano had very big food distribution going through Key Foods owned by Conte, and Metropolitan Beef Chain, owned by Castellano. I think Conte financed his business through old drug money, but after he was up and running he seems to have stayed clear of drugs or anything else. He had to be tied to Castellano though early Mafia relationship he could not get out of. Or he liked staying involved for matters like union help. Gravano had no reason to lie about that. Conte passed along drug money to Castellano, as well as to Gotti later. Gravano had reasons to lie if he was coaxed into it, or if he wanted to lash out at other Gambino Family members. He said he flipped because of Gotti, yet he told on everyone. He also said he was going straight, yet got right into things as soon as he hit Arizona. With Castellano's home wired to catch all conversations, did any come up where him and Conte discussed their dealings?
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: jace]
#719605
06/10/13 02:12 AM
06/10/13 02:12 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
Gravano had reasons to lie if he was coaxed into it, or if he wanted to lash out at other Gambino Family members. He said he flipped because of Gotti, yet he told on everyone. He also said he was going straight, yet got right into things as soon as he hit Arizona. With Castellano's home wired to catch all conversations, did any come up where him and Conte discussed their dealings? I think you're grasping at straws. He flipped because of Gotti but his deal with the government required him to tell everything he knew and not lie about it. I don't recall Castellano being picked up talking about Conte's drug business but that doesn't prove anything. He wasn't picked up talking about the Gambino brother's drug ring either. I just don't see a reason for Gravano to make up that story of talking to Conte for nothing.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: After the Castellano hit
[Re: jace]
#719611
06/10/13 02:33 AM
06/10/13 02:33 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
I think he could have made it up, not hat he definitely did. I think if Conte had really done it, they would have had a case on him. Conte was indicted for drug trafficking and Gravano testified against him. http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1987/Market...864a475365a13f1Someone just told me on another site that Gravano had deal to not testify agaisnt his own guys. That is strange, he would have more on them than anyone else, yet they got a pass. It was one of the concessions they were willing to give Gravano. Give him a pass with one crew and get everything he knew about the rest of the family.
Last edited by IvyLeague; 06/10/13 02:37 AM.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
|