Originally Posted By: pizzaboy
Why do you keep addressing me on this issue? You don't agree with the article, fine. Who gives a fuck? I didn't agree with it a hundred percent either. But you're just as bad as the fucking lefties when people don't agree with you. You go right into attack mode.

Re the article you posted: He makes some nice points. But he goes on a diatribe about why gun owners don't trust anti-gun people. So let me ask you this: Where does that put me? I mean, I own guns, two handguns and a hunting rifle. I've been licensed in both New York and Florida for almost as long as you've been alive. But just because I'm willing to listen to the argument for background check proposals and I think it's silly for a guy living in Scarsdale to own a military type weapon (notice I was careful not to label it an assault weapon), you automatically throw me into the column with the peaceniks and '60s leftovers.

Well, I'm not of that mind, son. I never have been. But again, your problem is that you're no more open to an honest discussion than that idiot Senator from California. Being that I'm not "all in" on the issue, you've taken the position that "if he ain't with us a hundred percent, he's against us." But that's what I get for being a political centrist. I get it from both sides.

maybe from now on i should include a smiley face everytime i'm trying to display a bit of lighthearted sarcasm and levity, i'm only busting balls by referencing you silly! wink lol whistle i'm not stupid, i'm well aware of where you stand so i thought it would be a bit funny to paint you all the way to one side, guess i was wrong! what can i say, most people have an issue or 2 where they feel strongly, mine just happens to be this, so it is what it is, similar to ivy and religon/gay marriage. wink lol smile

i'm very open to a debate or a discussion, and whether or not you agree with me, i've spent time both addressing and debating the concerns, questions, and many criticisms in this thread, only to have my contributions ignored entirely or brushed aside with some fancy legal talk. one of the main issues that i have with these debates is its just assumed that there should be a compromise right off the bat, something that can cause a great deal of disagreement from the very start. a wise man once told me that you are never going to change a mans opinions on religon, race, politics, drugs ect, so i try and keep that in mind. but hey, you started this thread, so..... cry have a good day sir! wink


It's either blue cheese with wings or go fuck yer mudda!