0 registered members (),
62
guests, and 32
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,475
Posts1,090,487
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#709949
04/11/13 01:53 PM
04/11/13 01:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296 Throggs Neck
pizzaboy
The Fuckin Doctor
|
The Fuckin Doctor

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,296
Throggs Neck
|
Because, believe it or not, the Feds tend to focus on Italian American bookmaking offices at least ten times as much as they focus on the non-italians. It makes for better press releases. And you know I'm no apologist. I hardly ever play the "Forever Bothering Italians" card. But what's right is right.
Gypsy bookmakers (and by Gypsy I just mean independent, it's in no way ethnic) have existed in New York for YEARS. It's nothing new. That street tax bullshit is so overhyped it's ridiculous.
Most of the mob connected guys that you're talking about have even layed off to the gypsies over the years. Because when you're a busy office, at the end of the day it's better to have a reliable out at five to one on Sunday afternoon than to shake a guy down for $200 a week. It's just better business. Forget all that "every bookmaker pays" nonsense. I could certainly believe law enforcement focuses more on the Italian-American bookies because of the Mafia connection. But that still wouldn't explain the extreme lack of non-Mafia/Italian bookmaking busts. People can talk about various exceptions they know of, and I take no issue with them on an individual basis, because I'm talking about the collective big picture. And the big picture, at least shown by indictments, is the illegal sports betting business in the Tri-State area, in much of the rest of the Northeast, and in Chicago is still very much connected to the LCN. But that comes in various forms, i.e. some operations being run directly by the LCN, others laying off to the LCN, others paying a street tax, etc.Well, I guess that's where we differ, Ivy. And it's really not that big a difference, it's just that our interpretations are different. You seem to be saying that every time an independent lays off to a connected guy, or vice versa, that that automatically puts the independent guy in the connected column because they do a little business together. The Feds do this too, to bolster their numbers (just like they do with EVERYTHING else). I just don't see it that way. In my opinion, if an independent isn't paying protection, and if he's not "on the record" with a wiseguy, then he's not connected. Because if he's not "with" a guy, then the guy certainly isn't going to lift a finger to help him if he gets jammed up. And that's the only perk of being a mob connected bookmaker: Having a guy to run to. So there you go. I see it one way, you see it another. No biggie.
"I got news for you. If it wasn't for the toilet, there would be no books." --- George Costanza.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: EastHarlemItal]
#709955
04/11/13 02:25 PM
04/11/13 02:25 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
There's a ton of guys not connected and not paying anyone! And Ivy since your more apt to keep an eye out for LCN headlines is t it safe to say you've missed the independent busts? Just a thought! I'd say there are more independent books than connected or paying for a connection! It's just not a valuable investment anymore. Actually, I keep track of all the bookmaking busts. I see them in other areas of the country as well. For a more recent example, look at the thread I started about the two bookmaking busts in Oklahoma City and Albany in the last couple days. The Albany one is a good example. One of the defendants is Joseph "Oink" Carucci. He's been involved in gambling busts up there in the past with George Bedigian. Although one Florida guy charged is/was a DeCavalcante associate, from what I can tell, in cases both past and present, these guys aren't mobbed up. And it's not necessarily surprising because Albany is far enough away from the mob's scope of influence. I don't think it's just a coincidence that the vast majority of bookmaking busts in those exact areas that have a big mob presence are mob-connected, while those further away often aren't. Of course, as pizzaboy said above, how one defines "connected" may vary. lol this thread is already fucked. We should change the title to "therapy and disagreements 101." I'll start another one and Ivy if you come on there with your bullshit, this guy will sit on your thick head. It's funny that you make up Outfit crews out of thin air but you call me the bullshitter. Anyway, I'd be happy to go back to talking about the current state of the Chicago Outfit. Of course, even there, we'll probably butt heads because you and the feds differ so often.
Last edited by IvyLeague; 04/11/13 02:26 PM.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#710085
04/11/13 11:01 PM
04/11/13 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
cookcounty
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
|
[quote=cookcounty]there's alot of land in the south suburbs and enough action to have a crew
Maybe the South Side/26th Street crew has some guys there but there isn't another crew based there, according to the FBI. the area is too vast for just "some guys" to be able to run rackets there's a crew that works the southburbs and northwest indiana they might report to somebody but there's still a crew
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#710110
04/12/13 07:16 AM
04/12/13 07:16 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
cookcounty
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
|
the area is too vast for just "some guys" to be able to run rackets
there's a crew that works the southburbs and northwest indiana
they might report to somebody but there's still a crew Well, then it probably would be elements of the South Side/26th Street crew. the southburbs combined with northwest indy is a decent chunk of land it would take a crew to run it
Last edited by cookcounty; 04/12/13 07:18 AM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: spmob]
#710232
04/12/13 08:03 PM
04/12/13 08:03 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
IvyLeague
|

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,534
|
Ivey, if you want a list of some names then PM me and I will give you a list. Im not putting out names on front street. Everyone has told you that its happening all over the east coast. You mention the Mastronados because they are the only ones you know cause they are the only ones who made the paper. They also have a political tie and have been doing it for years so the FBI and state police also have a hard on for them as they do the Mob. Your wrong and you look stupid arguing it still. But thats you...All day everyday arguing with everyone about everything on all threads on all forums. Your not always right. Its annoying. You could certainly send me names via PM. But that won't necessarily prove anything since there may be no way to verify them. You also have to consider that, even if you and others know of several independent bookmaking operations - and I do question your ability to really know their business - that doesn't mean what I'm saying regarding the overall picture isn't correct. This isn't about me being right. I'm just saying what the evidence tells me.
Last edited by IvyLeague; 04/12/13 08:03 PM.
Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: 123JoeSchmo]
#710389
04/13/13 07:31 PM
04/13/13 07:31 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
cookcounty
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
|
Cook you're being oversimplistic, doesn't matter how big the area is. Someone could be running a 100 million dollar betting ring on a small street corner in Gary, it doesn't take an entire crew to oversee that. you do realize that soldiers and some associates have crews in Chicago that Anthony calabrese guy being an example a few guys wouldn't be able to keep watch over that much territory they might not be their own bosses but it's still a crew of guys
Last edited by cookcounty; 04/13/13 07:32 PM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#710764
04/15/13 06:11 PM
04/15/13 06:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
cookcounty
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,213
|
a few guys wouldn't be able to keep watch over that much territory Why not? The Outfit has had to "watch over" generally the same amount of territory today with half the crews and a fraction of the membership it once had. And one way it's done it, apparently, is by streamlining it's operations. It's not really into anything and everything the way it used to be. It doesn't have a monolithic stranglehold on all criminal enterprises throughout the city. So it doesn't need the manpower it once did. the syndicate has never had a "monolithic stranglehold" in crime in Chicago the feds said al tournabene (consigliere) was in charge of the south suburbs you love quoting the feds and the feds said the south suburbs have operations
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: IvyLeague]
#719808
06/11/13 01:19 AM
06/11/13 01:19 AM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 999
mulberry
Underboss
|
Underboss
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 999
|
Actually, I keep track of all the bookmaking busts. I see them in other areas of the country as well. For a more recent example, look at the thread I started about the two bookmaking busts in Oklahoma City and Albany in the last couple days.
I seriously doubt that you know about every bookmaking bust in the country or even the NY/NJ area. There are probably dozens or hundreds busted each year that are never reported in the news. I've known several bookies who got busted and it never made the news. There are hundreds of independent bookies who never get busted because nobody is looking for them. When I was in college, all the Asians went to Asian bookies, the Indians went to Indian bookies etc. These other ethnic groups have no use for some goombahs who will end up stiffing them or shaking them down.
Last edited by mulberry; 06/11/13 01:20 AM.
|
|
|
Re: State of the Chicago Outfit
[Re: Faithful1]
#720892
06/18/13 01:51 AM
06/18/13 01:51 AM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 202
elmwoodparker
Made Member
|
Made Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 202
|
The Outfit doesn't exist anymore like it did years ago. The New Oufit is strictly White Collar. The old Blue Collar Outfit started to get phased out about 15 years ago. After 2002, it became more steadily phased out. When Marco D'Amico got out of prison in 2005, He was named acting Boss. All the men and relatives of men who are with him and Johnny Dfronzo etc. are all white collar. It is a different kind of Outfit that changed with the times. In 2007, The Feds said there were about 28 made guys. However, in the last 6 years, some of them are gone and there are many more NEW YOUNGER MEN who belong to the The Outfit and are college graduates who are related by blood or marriage to the Top Bosses. They are more like a powerful Sicilian Clan with strong political and Union Connections. The Blue Collar Bookmaking has almost completely been phased out and the Loan Sharking is basically non existent. There is no future in it.
Last edited by elmwoodparker; 06/18/13 01:52 AM.
|
|
|
|