Of course he is free. But is it constitutional? Suppose it passes. It can be challenged in courts and will be struck down, because it is not constitutional.
It's not against the Constitution for a Muslim to try and get bills passed that are influenced by their religion. Now, if they wanted to make Islam the official state religion of the U.S., that would be unconstitutional.
Bringing up the courts is futile to make your point because we've already seen the courts go far beyond their role, i.e. activist judges making law rather than interpreting law. I mean, they're all interpreting the same constitution. But yet why do so many of these judges interpret the same document differently? Furthermore, our system has become corrupted by the fact that it's more about case precedent today than what the Constitution says.
