so al this nonsense about protecting the "rights" of hunters applies to very few people apparently
a very strong argument there.
the rights of people should only be protected if...
#1: there is a big group of people, or
#2: perhaps most important to alot of folks on this site, only protect the rights that they personally believe in.
the stuff i listen to on here never seeks to shock me. we should protect the rights of all people, no matter how "fringe" you may think they are. you are a lawyer correct? do you understand the concept of a constitutional republic vs a direct democracy? our country was set up so that the majority can never take away the constitutionally protected rights of the minority, but sadly, so many are all to willing to give up whatever rights they have no stake in, all under the cover of being "progressive", absolutely sickening.
