This is the area of "you can't do anything right". People bemoaned the fact that the graphic writings and drawings of Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris were ignored and if only the police had investigated their homes, if only Cho's mental illness had been reported to authorities so he would have been denied his guns....Yet, when the police respond to a report about kids and guns, they are over-reacting.
Did this father have the right to keep his guns in the house with this boy? We're pretty much only hearing the father's side, so, while it's tempting to say this was a ridiculous case, we shouldn't draw conclusions without knowing more.
Sure hind site is always 20/20, and after any tragic event People cut it apart and try to blame others why things happen, but this is not that. This is a report done by a media person. Reporting what has gone on.
We can only hope that they are doing the job correctly and getting their facts straight before they print the story. As you notice the people being called out in the piece refuse to comment any further.
Is this any different then a women reporting an abuse and since you don't have the abusers side you throw it aside so easily, but I guess people can when they don't like the viewpoint the article is pointing out.
Looks like anything can be seen from a different viewpoint can't it.
