Originally Posted By: Sicilian Babe
If they are committed, and it is a civil union with all the rights you mentioned above, what is the difference between that and a heterosexual couple that goes to City Hall for their ceremony? It IS marriage, whatever you want to label it.


Even if a hetero couple gets married at City Hall, it's still viewed as a marriage. The point is, there needs to be a distinction made in the eyes of the law between the two, if only nominally.

Also of concern is what else this will lead into in terms of homosexuality being recognized and legitimized by society. We've already seen what's happened to Catholic charities because they wisely wouldn't allow gay couples to adopt children. "Other advocates of same-sex marriage are suggesting that tax exemptions and benefits be withdrawn from any religious organization that does not embrace same-sex unions. Public accommodation laws are already being used as leverage in an attempt to force religious organizations to allow marriage celebrations or receptions in religious facilities that are otherwise open to the public. Accrediting organizations in some instances are asserting pressure on religious schools and universities to provide married housing for same-sex couples. Student religious organizations are being told by some universities that they may lose their campus recognition and benefits if they exclude same-sex couples from club membership."

Supporters of gay marriage need to quit asking, "How does gay marriage effect you?" Because we're already seeing signs of it going from one thing to another once the can of worms is opened. And, if they were really honest, many supporters of gay marriage would admit they really wouldn't care if opponents of gay marriage were effected negatively. They'd probably relish it.

Last edited by IvyLeague; 04/04/13 11:12 PM.

Mods should mind their own business and leave poster's profile signatures alone.