someone bought a weapon and the sale was registered. Then that person sold the gun to someone else but failed to report it. When Ballistics shows who owned the gun, the registered owner is going to have hell to pay to get out of being charged with the crime (let alone civil liability for injuries).
so, the whole point of the new regulations are to prevent crime, but in this scenario the crime wasn't prevented. am i missing something here? its common sense that no law is 100% enforceable, but if the laws put into place are unenforceable, as well as ineffective with regards to the original stated goals of the legislation, why should they even be enacted in the first place?
