Do you think Genovese was framed about the drug deal or did he really do it? Or was he convicted for what he really did do, but on framed evidence? I understand he deserved to go to jail anyway, with all the corpses he left behind, but was the evidence in this particular case a complete frame-up, a frame-up on a crime that was really committed or was it a rightful conviction? What do you think?
I think it could've been either the thing i don't get is why did they not just kill him?
