so that makes it somehow more justified? he disarmed a particular group that he saw as a threat to prevent them from being able to defend themselves and then systematically rounded them up and murdered them! my point when bringing all this up was not to imply that if certain additional restrictions were imposed tomorrow we would all be doomed, but instead to show what is possible on the extreme end of the gun control issue. i don"t think something like this is likely to happen again but its just something to consider. i think its important to look at all possible scenarios no matter how extreme when a debate on restricting anything comes up.