Both arguments are correct. Scarfo was good in the sense that he brought in a lot of money from all different areas. At the end of the day, that is what it's all about to most of these guys, and the Philly Mob was as powerhouse. For that, Scarfo doesn't get enough credit. On the other hand, Ligambi ran things as flawlessly as one can in the modern age. It's no doubt he and John DiFronzo were two of the strongest dons of the new millennium, and they run things in a very similar, back to basics, low profile way.