I dont understand why adding the "Did you Know?" section at the end of Presidential biographies and leaving the original biography COMPLETELY intact is such a big deal. Republicans are obviously protesting since it makes it harder for them to paint Obama as a radical if he can show that his policy is actually not that original.

It DOES make sense to identify historical precedents for contemporary public policy issues and positions.

No need for people to get mad cause it was the Obama administration who thought of this idea instead of somebody in the past.


GW Bush changed some meta tags on his bio so that google searches for "miserable failure" wouldnt come up with his bio

http://searchenginewatch.com/article/205...te-House-Change