2 registered members (Ciment, 1 invisible),
86
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics43,501
Posts1,091,797
Members10,381
|
Most Online1,254 Mar 13th, 2025
|
|
|
Did Pentangelli TECHNICALLY violate Omerta?
#642122
03/29/12 09:58 PM
03/29/12 09:58 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 100
Crazy_Joe_Gallo
OP
Made Member
|
OP
Made Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 100
|
Yeah, he signed an affidavit, but it seems to have been largely under duress. He was charged with Murder One, Possession, Bookmaking, probably set up on those charges by Roth's people (He shows disdain for drug dealing earlier in the film, so I believe the drug charge was trumped up), and he and Cicci were convinced and misled into believing that Michael had them him up to be killed, basically betraying them to Hyman Roth for no reason despite years of loyal service--Selling their own Sicilian blood out to a "Jew in Miami".
Yes, he signed an affidavit, but when it came time to testify he didn't--Thus rendering his affidavit worthless and he claimed to not even really know Michael and that everything he told the FBI people was a lie. His testimony as it were actually HELPED Michael in that it destroyed the credibility of the case. It made the Senate's case look like a joke, a sham, that the Senate
I just think given the circumstances and the way ALL of them were played by Roth, he and Cicc' should've been given a pass. They were set up. They didn't go with the Feds out of malice, but to survive, under duresss: Either be killed by Michael (so they thought) or killed by the Rosato Brothers. Given the circumstances both likely felt there was no safe place left on the streets for them.
Last edited by Crazy_Joe_Gallo; 03/29/12 10:23 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Did Pentangelli TECHNICALLY violate Omerta?
[Re: JCrusher]
#642134
03/30/12 02:07 AM
03/30/12 02:07 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 100
Crazy_Joe_Gallo
OP
Made Member
|
OP
Made Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 100
|
Frankie was probably one of the most loyal guys but he got scrweed over. I dotn think he had to die especially after he didnt end up testifying anyway. I mean ist not like he was gonna talk again Yeah I truly doubt he would EVER have talked again. He seemed resigned to his fate. He seemed very reluctant to testify as it was, even before his brother showed up. He was banking on Michael taking the Fifth Amendment so that he wouldn't have to testify. He got royally screwed over by Hyman Roth and used as a pawn by Michael against Roth. He was misled. So was Michael and everyone else. He should've been given a pass. It wasn't like he was Roth's partner or like he conspired against Michael.
|
|
|
|