Originally Posted By: IvyLeague
[quote=Lilo]Just because a right is not specifically enumerated doesn't mean it doesn't exist. shhh


Quote:


With your kind of thinking, the interpretation of the Constitution becomes so stretched and warped, that our laws will eventually look nothing like it's a original self. The fact that abortion was based on "right to privacy" shows just how much people can twist the Constitution to their liking. And since it's 2012 and not 1776, shouldn't we be a little more "evolved" and "sophisticated" in how we treat unborn children. Yes, yes, I know, a woman's "right to choose" (cough...bullshit) is more important.

Originally Posted By: olivant
Babe, if a woman aborts, she is killing her child; she is killing her flesh and blood. What in God's name makes the life of a child as an issue of rape or incest less valuable than your life? Nothing does. Her decision to kill her child is a function of convenience. As I posted above: dress it up in all of the emotion you want to. But it's just convenience.


I'm glad your at least honest in admitting that. The "pro-choice" crowd has worked very hard to almost turn abortion into a good thing. But it is what it is.


Despite my stance on abortion, I support the courts' use of substantive due process as the context for some of their decisions. I trust the justices to make prudent decisions. Despite the abhorrent consequences of Roe v. Wade, the basis of the decision was proper.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."