2 registered members (dixiemafia, 1 invisible),
229
guests, and 3
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums21
Topics42,478
Posts1,061,643
Members10,349
|
Most Online1,100 Jun 10th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: Was Part III unnecessary?
[Re: Turnbull]
#620660
11/18/11 11:25 AM
11/18/11 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468 With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
dontomasso
Consigliere to the Stars
|
Consigliere to the Stars
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,468
With Geary in Fredo's Brothel
|
Necessary? No. Potentially valuable? Yes. As filmed? III worked as the denouement of Michael Corleone's life. Just wasn't brought off with anywhere near the same quality as GF and II. I agree 100%. Paraphrasing Brando, "Godfather Part III could have been a contender."
"Io sono stanco, sono imbigliato, and I wan't everyone here to know, there ain't gonna be no trouble from me..Don Corleone..Cicc' a port!"
"I stood in the courtroom like a fool."
"I am Constanza: Lord of the idiots."
|
|
|
Re: Was Part III unnecessary?
[Re: olivant]
#621222
11/22/11 03:18 PM
11/22/11 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 831 New Market, MD
DeathByClotheshanger
OP
Underboss
|
OP
Underboss
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 831
New Market, MD
|
I do believe that, in most cases, we reap what we sow. The tragedy of the Trilogy is not so much what happened to Michael, but what happened to those around him. In that other people paid the price for Michael's life of greed and quest for power.
|
|
|
|