I was being sarcastic...as far as books and reports go, he knows a few things, but he doesn't know any of these guys we talk about. A lot of the shit he says is just assumptions.
You could count on one hand (and have a few fingers left over) the amount of posters on these forums who actually know these guys we're talking about. So sifting through info from books, articles, reports, indictments, etc. is what we have to work with.
And I'm very curious as to what "assumptions" of mine you're talking about? I certainly make an assumption now and again but "lots?" I don't think so.
