The only compelling new information presented to me is the Calabrese testimony. Despite reading Family Secrets about three times, I'd never read that stat; I don't think it was in there.

Everything else is essentially in line with what I originally thought.

Sure I could be wrong. I guess it comes down to which statistics you want to believe.

For reasons I've already gone over I'm more inclined to believe the lower end stats from the early-mid 2000s.

Factor in everyone who's gone to jail since then, the very consistent, and drastic, decline of the mob since the 80s, the utter lack of any information on new Chicago mob members, the very minimal mob activity that's been reported on since the 90s, and I think I'm more right than not.

Do you admit I could be right?