...out of curiosity if he or likeminded thinkers do not think that the SC should have judicial review then what does he think the SC is there for? What should they be doing in his worldview?
Again, you would have to ask him (or likeminded thinkers)...but again in reference to the case specified by olivant, Levin also explains in detail how the decision was orchestrated by Justice Marshall as a political move, and a masterful one at that. So in that particular case you apparently have the SC using the court to serve their own political agenda.
