Levin does answer it Apple by simply stating that Marshall's Marbury decision in 1803 should not be construed as a gateway for judicial review (but only when he disagrees with the substance of such review). Of course, as I stated in my previous post above, he ignores the Constitution's Article III, Section 2.
"Generosity. That was my first mistake." "Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us." "Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."
