Originally posted by Chilltown:
he should be ashamed by this-he basically said it was all about money and prestige/ranking-what happened to working for the art of acting.
Using that argument, can't you say the same thing about Coppola? Why didn't he just make the movie for the sake of art?
Originally posted by Chilltown:
you know what though, i don't even like him as an actor, never have, and i still think that putting his money towards Bridget Fonda and George Hamilton was a smart marketing move.
Duvall, IMO, is one of the best actors of the generation; he has tons of great performances.
Bridget Fonda and George Hamilton did absolutely nothing for the movie, except perhaps to make it worse than it already was.
