It depends on what the meaning of the word "IT" is. Specifically, it depends on whether the first "IT" refers to the same thing as the second "IT." If the worth or usefulness of (2nd) IT ALL exceeds that of (1st)IT ALL, then it may make sense to risk IT ALL. It depends on how risky the situation for IT ALL is. However, just because someone has a job and gets laid, it doesn't mean one ought not to risk IT ALL for IT ALL (better job, better lay). Even if one is satified with IT ALL, there is no guarantee that one will always have IT ALL. Economies and biologies both eventually lag. But at least economies bounce back. II all depends on IT.