The Twilight films and novels are probably what you'd expect from a fundamentalist Mormon author.

This is what I wrote about the first film:

The hype surrounding this franchise - taken from bestselling novels written by a fundamentalist Mormon - might suggest a divisive, love-or-hate slice of pop culture. But what is essentially a head-over-heels swoon-fest for both Robert Pattinson the actor and Ed Cullen the character (the former is awkward and the latter impossibly perfect) is also, barring the fact the object of desire is a vampire (who sparkles in sunlight!), decidedly ordinary.

And the second:

Nostalgic and juvenile in the same way that Star Wars was nostalgic and juvenile, this sequel is less unassuming than the first film and more incoherent. Attempting to complicate or add dimension to the one-note romance of the first film by expanding on the character of Jacob, this is let down by seemingly rushed CGI work and a very dull action finale set in Rome. Isabella's essential emotional flimsiness is never explored; the generic coming-of-age hysteria instead boils down to her eternal faith in a vampire, which would all be fine and permissible if the film didn't take such relish in its higher pretensions of seriousness. Dawson's Creek was better.

...dot com bold typeface rhetoric.
You go clickety click and get your head split.
'The hell you look like on a message board
Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?