Ruthless is as ruthless does. Michael said it succinctly when he wooed Kay in New Hampshire: "My father is no different than other men with responsibilities..." Powerful men have always justified the use of force--or being "forceful" or "effective"--to get their way, and identifying getting their way with overall good. "Politicians don't have people killed," Kay replied. Was Truman "ruthless" in using atomic bombs to bring an end to WWII? Was Gov. Rockefeller "ruthless" in ordering NY State troopers to use tear gas and shotguns to end a revolt at Attica State Prison? The end justifies the means--as long as you agree with the end.