Scornful? Why scornful? I just think that the victims and their families need to be given more rights and consideration in the judicial process than they currently receive. I think that they should have input on whether she's released or not.

As I said, she was sentenced to death almost 40 years ago. She received the ability to see her family, to be alive. That's more than the victims received, and I don't think she should be given special consideration because she's dying. It shouldn't have any impact on her release.

If the parole board had found her suitably remorseful, she would have received her release. Obviously they didn't, so she should stay in prison.


President Emeritus of the Neal Pulcawer Fan Club