There is a "grass roots" movement to raise the millions of dollars necessary for a "revote" in Floirida. In this sense "grass roots" is synonymous with "Clinton supporters."

The DNC shouldn't change its mind on these issues and say, "Those states, who knowingly violated our primary code such that we found it necessary to strip them of their delegates, will now decide the party's nominee." Howard Dean nevertheless seems to be hinting at finding a way to hold additional elections. My problem is that the legislatures knew that by moving up their elections, they were bucking the system and risking having their states stripped of its delegates. The decision was made accordingly and all of the candidates agreed to the rules.

A challenge in federal court won't or shouldn't examine whether the stripping of the delegations was just. Rather, the inquiry should be limited whether the DNC has the authority to impose such a sanction in reference to the selection of its presidential nominee.

If Clinton is within striking distance after the Pennsylvania primary, there will be growing pressure on the DNC to allow the delegates to be seated.