Originally Posted By: dontomasso
 Originally Posted By: sleeper
I guess I see it.

Frankie already gave an affidavite about the family in which he already broke the silence. So I do not see the problem with him testifying. In this case he got to deny his previous statements. It seems that the scene in the government apartmemt was for dramatic effect.


Its one thing to give an affidavit to the Authorities, and it is quite another to go to a publichearing and announce what you know to the world.


Right. His testimony in open court would supercede his written testimony.

To WT: the 5th amendment to the US Constitution prohibits the federal government from compelling a person to testify against themselves in a criminal proceeeding unless they are given immunity from prosecution.


"Generosity. That was my first mistake."
"Experience must be our only guide; reason may mislead us."
"Instagram is Twitter for people who can't read."