Just a bad film overall. Fight Club was so much better. And I'd like to see Se7en too.
I agree with you that FIGHT CLUB and SE7EN were better films than ZODIAC. However, I didn't find it to be horrible. I'd place it 3rd on my list for the best films of 2007 thus far (it's been pretty lackluster to me)
1) GRINDHOUSE 2) 300 3) ZODIAC
Just because FIGHT CLUB and SE7EN are better films(hell, I have ZODIAC and FIGHT CLUB share the same rating) doesn't make ZODIAC any less brilliant.
Its logic like this why I hate the NEW YORK TIMES. If a new movie from a proclaimed master isn't as good as his best works, it sucks. What retarded bullshit.
I didn't say ZODIAC wasn't any less brilliant. I simply said I preferred FIGHT CLUB and SE7EVN rather than this movie and it was my 3rd favorite of 2007. Where did I say it was any less brilliant?
No but you wrote it like as good as ZODIAC is as a film, its nothing to those others...and that tone of writing annoys me. Its fanboy review-writing that clogs up AICN and IMDB.
Why not simply just say its another damn good/great movie from Fincher? I mean, tone is everything in reviews.
Besides, FANTASTIC FOUR is funny? I already question your KNOCKED UP review, since what comedy is funny to you if FF is funny to you? I don't trust you with comedy.
Originally Posted By: Irishman12
Originally Posted By: ronnierocketAGO
BUG (2006) - ****
Irish will hate this movie. I'm sure talking about it to his Blockbuster co-workers, he says how boring it is, how not scary it is, and how nothing interesting happens. Then he sees me typing all of this, and he then writes of how he likes the movie, or how smart critics dug the movie.
Better yet, if Taratino and the media go ape for it, he'll follow suite.
Hey fathersson, ease up on the loving. As his signature, you've always got me in mind. For you're information, I've never seen BUG and I no longer work at Blockbuster. Come back with some new material you broken record
Okay, here is a new one. 22-29 - 4th place - AL East
