it's one of those rare examples that is decidedly auteuristic ('of the director') and still collaborative in the mainstream Hollywood respect.
It's one of many examples in that respect. I wouldn't say, "rare."
Okay, fair enough. But I can think of only a few directors whose productions are of the same kind of example: Hitchcock's masterpieces, Wilder's best work, probably Sirk, too.
I guess I could revise what I said and say Kane is rare in that it is also very good...
But you might disagree with that, too.
...dot com bold typeface rhetoric. You go clickety click and get your head split. 'The hell you look like on a message board Discussing whether or not the Brother is hardcore?
