Since this story is being thrown at us daily, it's hard not to pay attention to some of it.

Can anyone think of any possible reason (other than what seems obvious) why Howard K. Stern wouldn't want to provide his DNA to get this paternity thing over with? This particular phase of the never ending story would be over if he did so. Then again, they won't need Stern's DNA if Burket's is a match will they?

However, I hear he is appealing it because he claims Larry Burket hasn't proven that he was with Anna Nicole during that time span. What better way to prove it than to give your DNA and get the whole damn thing over with?

TIS

PS: How funny that write after I post this, I hear that Stern's appeal has been rejected.

Last edited by The Italian Stallionette; 04/02/07 11:54 AM.
"Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind. War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today." JFK

"War is over, if you want it" - John Lennon