Originally posted by AppleOnYa:
If you're talking about the movie, it isn't until several minutes AFTER all this that Kay comes to the realization that Michael did indeed order Carlo's murder.
You appear to be mixing up timeframes simply in order to keep this discussion going.
Huh?
What I'm saying is, why does Kay even ask Michael about Carlo's death? Why is she so upset that Michael may have ordered it? Why does she need assurance from him that he did not? Because she wants to believe that he is incapable of doing such a thing.
But if she already knew that Michael had personally killed Sollozzo and McCluskey, then she already had her answer about Carlo. There was no need to ask.But the fact that she did ask is the reason why I don't think she knew that Michael
had killed the Sollozzo & McCluskey, nor that it was the reason he disappeared for 2+ years. If she did know that, then she would have known that Michael was perfectly capable of ordering Carlo's execution.
It is my personal feeling that Kay only realized that Michael had killed Sollozzo and McCluskey when it came to light at the Senate hearings, and this was one more aspect of him that deeply upset her.
