Apologies if this has been polled before, but I didn't see it. (I searched, honest .) One of the "justifications" (or, as I like to call it, "excuses") I've come across for Michael killing Fredo is that there was a danger that Fredo -- whether because of his gullibility or his jealousy -- would betray Michael again, thus putting his life and his family's life in danger.

I wonder if the majority of us or the minority of us REALLY feel this way. So here's the question that will measure this quantitatively:

If Michael had let Fredo live, do you think that Fredo, either inadvertently or deliberately, would have betrayed him again or otherwise put his life in danger similar to the way he did the first time in GF2?

Had he lived, would Fredo have betrayed or endangered Michael again? single choice
	Yes. (He would either endanger him unintentionally or plot against him deliberately.);
	No. (He was truly sorry for what he had done. He had learned his lesson, so much so that he would be cautious and untrusting if approached again by Family enemies OR friends.);
	Don't know.
Votes accepted starting: 12/31/69 08:00 PM You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.

Would Fredo do it inadvertently or deliberately? single choice
	I answered "No" to question 1. He wouldn't do it at all.
	I answered "Don't Know" to question 1. I can't decide if he would betray or endanger Michael again.
	I believe he would endanger or betray Michael again, but I don't know or don't have an opinion as to how.
	I think he would do it inadvertently. His gullibility would lead him to believe that Michael would be harmed at most, but not killed.
	I think he would do it deliberately. He wants Michael out of the way, and would knowingly plot to kill him, or otherwise disable him enough so that he (Fredo); could be boss.
Votes accepted starting: 12/31/69 08:00 PM You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.