[sic] regardless.
Judiciousnes is predicated on judgement. And what in the world is reprehensible about pointing out to someone that they don't have a flesh and blood stake in their judgements?
of its grammatical nonexistence, I like it better this way, thank you very much.
What is reprehensible? It's like saying that you can't decide whether child molestation is a crime because you aren't a parent. Boxer made an insinuation that Rice, because she has no children, cannot fathom the sacrifice being made.
And, once again, I've pointed out the hypocrisy of that argument.
