Quote
Originally posted by dontomasso:
Quote
Originally posted by Don Cardi:
[b] [QUOTE]

You know about that better than I do. Am I correct in my assertion? Would that fall under hearsay?


Don Cardi cool
Exactly DC it would be hearsay as to Clemenza or Frankie and double hearsay as to Michael. Thats why they needed Frankie to connect the dots. [/b]
Right, dt! In fact, no prosecutor could ever indict Michael on Cicci's testimony precisely because he never got a direct order. That's one of the reasons I think it's possible that Cicci actually may have consciously tried to help Michael by lying about never getting a direct order from him. At the end of GF, just as Tessio's about to be taken for a ride, Cicci says, "Tom, Sal, the boss says for you to go on ahead [to the meeting with Barzini]." Now, that could have been a made-up ruse to get Tessio into the car. But if Michael really did tell that to Cicci, it'd mean that he did get a direct order from Michael--in this case, an order directly relating to the murder of Tessio.


Ntra la porta tua lu sangu � sparsu,
E nun me mporta si ce muoru accisu...
E s'iddu muoru e vaju mparadisu
Si nun ce truovo a ttia, mancu ce trasu.